
FEBRUARY 8, 2004 at 3:11 PM
Posted by CHEESER
Source: Amazon France
According to Amazon France
, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban will be 135 minutes, or two hours and fifteen minutes long.
That falls in line with what Canadian television site CTV reported in January. Director Alfonso CuarĂ³n allegedly said author JK Rowling's story lent itself to a tighter script than the first two films.
Thanks to Winky of Potter World Online
for the tip.
Reader Comments (91)
Your Thoughts
click to write...
Copyright © 2002-2009 HPANA. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. ![]()
HPANA is an unofficial fan site, in no way affiliated with J.K. Rowling,
Scholastic Books, Bloomsbury Publishing or Warner Bros. Entertainment. All
trademarks and copyrighted material are the property of their respective owners.
About HPANA | Movie 6 | Send a news tip | Contact us | Privacy policy
Auror
Points: 2337
Rassele says:
I really hope they do a good job on this movie since its my favorite book, and I dunno, but 2 hours and 15 min sounds kinda short to me....
Posted Feb 10, 2004 at 4:46 PM EST
Astro Zombie
Points: 2577
Fallen Bomb says:
Is this official? I hope not I was hoping for a longer movie. But oh well atleast it's a movie.
Posted Feb 10, 2004 at 7:19 PM EST
Squib
Points: 116
HPlover43 says:
I wish it was longer. I hope they don't leave out the good parts but the whole book is wonderful how can they make it so short.
Posted Feb 10, 2004 at 7:35 PM EST
Muggle
Points: 86
Hpliker says:
Man why cant it be at least a full three hours like the LOTR movies? Man! but i will still love the mivie
Posted Feb 10, 2004 at 8:07 PM EST
Professor
Points: 1157
lizzie5987 says:
oh, Why didin't they make it longer! :( well i guess is going to be just fine, but still i know i'm going to want more fater its done
Posted Feb 11, 2004 at 12:21 AM EST
Professor
Points: 1140
dan's girl says:
That's too bad i was hoping for something longer after such a long wait.
Posted Feb 11, 2004 at 5:19 AM EST
Prefect
Points: 308
davie7117 says:
well I dont care if its long or short,, I love the movie and I will love it long or short..
Posted Feb 11, 2004 at 11:15 AM EST
Witch
Points: 576
Chandra80D says:
Ugh - nearly 3 hours long. don't get me wrong, I don't care - but think about it. This one is going to be long, the 4th even longer. And parents are going to bring their children into this movie.
I can hear the roudy, tired children now...30 minutes into movie. And they only get worse...
Posted Feb 11, 2004 at 2:51 PM EST
Lethifold
Points: 2863
Snitch Sox says:
Dosen't sound too bad!
I'm more worried about GoF! PoA is one of my favs but Goblet has to be treated with respect!
Posted Feb 12, 2004 at 3:34 PM EST
Snape's Woman
(Moderator)
Points: 5392
Prof. Andaxia Moonstar says:
Personally, I would like to see a much longer film (around three-and-a-quarter hours), but I can understand their decision - shorter running times mean more showings per day which turns into more money for the studio. However, they are treading a thin line; if the movies are so short they sacrifice plot elements or fan favorites, the studio could end up alienating its most important customers - the loyal HP fanbase. I just pray GOF will not be cut to such a short length; audiences have shown they will reward longer movies if they are done well, with a captivating story (*cough* LOTR and Titanic *cough*).
Posted Feb 12, 2004 at 11:40 PM EST
Order of Merlin, 2nd Class
Points: 1660
siriusgyal says:
Ok am i the only who object to this sort of antics.
They couldn't fit CS into 2hours 40 how they gonna do this??
i need to lie down
Posted Feb 13, 2004 at 6:39 PM EST
Professional Beater
Points: 20891
feltonluver says:
I really hope they do remember to put everything in there, but I'm sure the story has changed a little because Snape is protecting the trio! Wished it was longer!
Posted Feb 21, 2004 at 7:11 PM EST
Order of Merlin, 3rd Class
Points: 1445
PotionMaster says:
Maybe being shorted then the other two won't be a horrible thing. Quality is better the quantity. As much as a hate to admit it, CoS did drag a little at times. Just a little.
Posted Mar 8, 2004 at 9:51 AM EST
Unspeakable
Points: 3920
stocco says:
That sucks. I liked it when the movies were longer than that. Harry Potter has so much detail, the movies need to be long.
Posted Mar 23, 2004 at 5:59 PM EST
Rickmaniac to the Core
Points: 2564
snaily says:
That's comparatively a short screening time but at least this movie did some justice to the book unlike OotP. ♥♥♥
Posted Jul 9, 2008 at 10:05 AM EST
Auror
Points: 2424
bonniewrightrulz says:
I really dont remember the exact running time of the POA movie.I do think it was a bit more than two hours,maybe it was 15 minutes.
Posted Aug 3, 2008 at 11:20 AM EST
Back to top of page