|
SEPTEMBER 26, 2005 at 10:05 PM
Posted by GERI
Source: The Leaky Cauldron
Last month we reported
that Warner Bros. had promised to fix an error that appeared in a released photo from Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.
The photo in question showed Harry standing in front of the Riddle’s headstone at the end of the film but with a glaring error in the name and date of the deceased.
Moviefone has published a new picture of the same scene with the correction made.
Reader Comments (320)
Your Thoughts
click to write...
Copyright © 2002-2010 HPANA. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. 
HPANA is an unofficial fan site, in no way affiliated with J.K. Rowling,
Scholastic Books, Bloomsbury Publishing or Warner Bros. Entertainment. All
trademarks and copyrighted material are the property of their respective owners.
About HPANA | Movie 6 | Send a news tip | Contact us | Privacy policy
226-250 251-275 276-300 301-320
Witch
Points: 992
LoonyLuna11 says:
I'm so glad they fixed this. It would have been a HUGE mistake to leave it the way it was! Those of us who have read the books know who is really burried there, but think of those who haven't. It would've been major confusion.
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 1:31 PM EST
Auror
Points: 2175
Andromeda Meliflua says:
I'm glad they fixed it, getting the Dark lord's name wrong is a big mistake!! But I don't get why his grandfather's named figures as "Thomas", while his father is "Tom"...still I'm not gonna hate the movie because of that little thing. I can't wait to see it actually I think this is gonna be the best so far!!!
Oh and I REALLY like the stone figure behind Harry which is part of the tomb. It reminds me of a Dementor...
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 1:32 PM EST
Order of Merlin, 4th Class
Points: 1314
Lemon Drop says:
Good, I am glad they fixed it. It was bothering me a bit but even if they did not fix it I would have still seen the movie. That is what's fun about movies from books, you can point out all the blunders.
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 1:40 PM EST
Magical Sanitary Supplier
Points: 2518
5225 says:
It can be both important and unimportant in the same way. I mean by important is the accuracy of the data, given by the book. What I mean by unimportant is common viewers will not really pay attention to it. But that's my opinion. I am sorry if I have made it unpleasant for you to see
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 1:44 PM EST
High Inquisitor
Points: 23488
KT Lady says:
Well that's good that they fixed it! I didn't even notice anything the first time I saw the old picture :P I was too busy er...looking at Dan. :)
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 1:46 PM EST
Professor
Points: 1175
hermyfreak says:
I'm really really really (etc. ect. etc..) happy that they changed this. It would disrupt the entire flow of the 6th book! And what's with the tripple burrial thing? I got a little confused, it's just Tom Riddle Sr.'s grave, not back and back and back? Is this a JKR clue, or Warrner Brothers being anoyingly not cannon again?
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 2:03 PM EST
Muggle Representative
Points: 9117
The Lime says:
I wouldn't have noticed anything, if nobody has mentioned it really.. I don't look at stuff like that, but It's cool we have some that see it.. :)
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 2:06 PM EST
Student
Points: 273
the_5th_element says:
[b] PLEASE EVERYONE READ [b]
For the record and those who can't seem to see the differences between the two pictures:
The changes are:
1. The middle name "Marvolo" is taken out of the new picture and "Riddle" and the dates are moved up. I guess if you haven't read the books you don't know why they would remove "Marvolo" but if you have read then you should realize it is not Lord Voldemort/Tom Marvolo Riddle who is dead and in that grave, it is the FATHER of Lord Voldemort/Tom Marvolo Riddle, whose name is "Tom Riddle". And the two people above are Lord Voldemort/Tom Marvolo Riddle's grandparents.
2. The years on the bottom have been changed from "1915-1943" to "1905-1943"
So please, no more "I don't see any changes". I hope no one takes this in a mean way but there are like 50 messsages saying similiar things like that.
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 2:11 PM EST
Squib
Points: 197
Amber luvs Dan! says:
Yeah!!! They fixed it. I didn't notice too much but I guess it was a big deal!!!
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 2:15 PM EST
Head Girl
Points: 429
Nikki loves Tom says:
Thank goodness they fixed it. I think its kind of cool when mistakes like that are made.
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 2:21 PM EST
Witch
Points: 613
chrissytine says:
the new one harry looks different like more digitized and the picture is zoomed out. And in the old one harry looks normal it is just a number i say they should have left it alone.
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 2:30 PM EST
Mrs. Draco Malfoy
Points: 27909
Arika Granger Malfoy says:
Lovely...I am glad they fixed it.....the had Tom Mavrolo Riddle on it and Voldemort isn't even dead yet.....well not buried.......that scene is going to be soo cool though!!!
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 2:35 PM EST
Order of Merlin, 2nd Class
Points: 1601
Truska says:
Well done Warner Brothers! You fixed it! I probably wouldn't have noticed if it hadn't been pointed out to me, but now that I know what the mistake was I am so glad that the changed it.
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 2:38 PM EST
Muggle
Points: 99
GinnysAuror41 says:
I knew about the mistake before, im just glad that they fixed it
Cant wait for the movie
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 2:39 PM EST
Order of Merlin, 1st Class
Points: 1805
Swimangel57 says:
Good!!! I'm really glad that they fixed this. It bothered me from the first time I saw it! They knew theywe wouldn't let them live if the movie came out and it wasn't fixed! I can't wait for November!
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 2:41 PM EST
Student
Points: 236
JeffHodapp says:
Gosh, I hope there are no more mistakes. The movies are never as good as the books but they are magical, aren't they?
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 2:48 PM EST
Head Boy
Points: 421
Jared Raschke says:
It great that they fix that.
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 2:49 PM EST
Student
Points: 208
decinaty says:
At least they care enough to fix these things.
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 2:52 PM EST
The Fifth Marauder
Points: 2779
Remus_David_Luver says:
Woohoo! They changed it! I was wondering when they were going to, and it's a lucky thing it was noticed, how bad and embarrasing would it have been for WB if it had gone un-noticed?!
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 2:55 PM EST
Student
Points: 208
decinaty says:
... What i think is funny is that is a small little still that only true fans would have noticed, and people are making such a big deal, but when they leave out a whole chapter (the dursleys) people are okay with it? I would take the messed up still over the missing chapters... (like S.P.E.W)
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 2:55 PM EST
Points: 1797
howdoideletethis says:
Wow, I hadn't even noticed a mistake!
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 3:03 PM EST
Order of Merlin, 1st Class
Points: 1909
Hermione5 says:
I hoped they would fix it! That was just too big of a mistake that was. They should care more. I think J.K. should participate more actively in the movie-making!
P.S.: Ron and Hermione forever!
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 3:08 PM EST
Witch
Points: 888
HarrySiriusly says:
Im just glad they fixed it and the movie is so close to being here!
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 3:29 PM EST
Mrs. Ronald Weasley
Points: 2606
hplover234 says:
I knew they would fix that.
I am so glad that they did.
There was a BIG difference in it so I am totally excited about the change.
I cannot wait till November. I wish that the month would hurry up and already come. I don't think that I could wait anymore than I already have to.
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 3:33 PM EST
Order of Merlin, 1st Class
Points: 1968
Silverblood says:
I am glad that they have fixted that erro.
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 3:39 PM EST
Eclipse Fairy
Points: 4434
luna13 says:
I'm so glad that they have fixed this error! I would have probably had to have been escorted out the cinema if they hadent! :P
Posted Sep 27, 2005 at 3:41 PM EST
226-250 251-275 276-300 301-320
Back to top of page