|
OCTOBER 24, 2005 at 5:39 PM
Posted by CHEESER
Source: Veritaserum via DanRadcliffe.com
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire has a running time of 156 minutes and 54 seconds, according to the British Board of Film Classification
. That's a mere six seconds shy of what we reported earlier this month based on a reliable source (who apparently rounded up).
Veritaserum reports that the final 13 minutes, which contain the film's credits, are worth sitting through to get some extra laughs.
This length makes it the second longest Potter film after Chamber of Secrets, which clocked in at 161 minutes, even though the book is twice as long.
The BBFC recently rated Goblet of Fire 12A, meaning no one under 12 years old may see the movie without an accompanying adult. The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) rated the film PG-13 in the U.S. which places kids under 13 under the same restriction.
Reader Comments (208)
Your Thoughts
click to write...
Copyright © 2002-2009 HPANA. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. 
HPANA is an unofficial fan site, in no way affiliated with J.K. Rowling,
Scholastic Books, Bloomsbury Publishing or Warner Bros. Entertainment. All
trademarks and copyrighted material are the property of their respective owners.
About HPANA | Movie 6 | Send a news tip | Contact us | Privacy policy
Vader's Veela
Points: 3858
seekerfan says:
GoF is my favorite HP book. I would have been happy with a 3 hour movie. I'll take what I can get.
Posted Oct 28, 2005 at 11:09 PM EST
Auror
Points: 4080
RON's all up in heRmiONe says:
Omigod! I can't wait until the movie comes out. Are the bloopers going to be on the DVD? If they are then that's all I need to hear.
Posted Oct 29, 2005 at 12:37 AM EST
Princess of Nargles
Points: 4137
hp_fan206 says:
That's great... I do think I would have probably enjoyed the movie if it was a little longer... I mean, considering the fact that the book is twice as long. But I mean, the more action-packed, the better :)
Posted Oct 29, 2005 at 6:43 PM EST
Professor
Points: 1050
Phoenix Lover says:
I don't think its good that it's shorter than COS. That must mean they took a lot out of the movie.
Posted Oct 30, 2005 at 12:24 PM EST
Head Boy
Points: 405
dtree1992 says:
Thaqt is way too short too be a decent film. Camber was definitly the best film.
Posted Oct 30, 2005 at 12:43 PM EST
Witch
Points: 913
MaeMuffin[DOT] says:
YYYYYYYIIIPPPPEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
156 minutes of pure HP HEAVEN!!!!!!!!!!!
*CELABRATES*
Posted Oct 30, 2005 at 5:30 PM EST
Auror
Points: 2495
Jbird says:
Well, I wish it were longer, hopefully they did a good job with all the important scenes. I can't believe CoS is that long, it always seemed so short to me.
Posted Oct 30, 2005 at 5:38 PM EST
Auror
Points: 2424
bonniewrightrulz says:
That's too short,to be honest.I was expecting atleast three hours but i know now that'll never happen with a Harry Potter film.
Posted Jul 5, 2008 at 4:25 PM EST
Back to top of page